Revue Droits Fondamentaux, 2001-2002

“La House of Lords et le principe du stare decisis”, Mélanges offerts à Michel Hanotiau, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2000, pp. 285-330

T. Berns, "Exposition du politique au mal ou absorption du mal par le politique : Machiavel et la philosophie", in : Les archives de philosophie du droit et de philosophie sociale (ARSP), vol. 87-3, 87, 2001, p.363-372

T. Berns, "La Res Publica subvertie : exposition de l’universel aux revendications partielles", in: Multitudes, n°6, septembre 2001, p.15-25
Download the article on the Multitudes review website

"Il ’Romolo machiavelliano’. Il momento dell’origine dello stato nel pensiero di Machiavelli", in: Finestre sul Rinascimento, ed. by Patrizia Castelli, Ferrara, 2001, p.3-30

T. Berns, "L’originaire de la loi chez Machiavel", in : L’enjeu Machiavel, Paris, PUF, Librairie du Collège International de Philosophie, 2001, p. 123-140

C.D.P.K., 2001/3, 2001
In the case of Kudla v. Poland, discussed here, the European Court of Human Rights has overtly taken a sharp turn in jurisprudence, from this point forward demanding the existence of effective remedy (in the sense of article 13 of the Convention) , allowing an applicant to plead before a national jusrisdiction on grounds of excessive duration of judicial proceedings. This new case law, it seems, will not remain without consequence for the investigation of the (...)

L’université en questions - Collectif sous la direction de Julie Allard, Guy Haarscher et Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, 2001
Labor

L’université en questions - Collectif sous la direction de Julie Allard, Guy Haarscher et Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, 2001
Labor
As a scientific institution, the university is a place of both power and autonomy. Therefore philosophy must examine the status of politics at the university. Two main philosophical issues will be tackled. The first, based on Kant’s writings, is how to think for oneself and, at the same time, think in community. How can the university’s knowledge be both free and (...)

Actuel Marx, 39, 2001 P.U.F.
The droit d’auteur is torn between two opposing paradigms: on the one hand, the market economy model, which provides economic freedom and private property, tends to merchandise the creative works; on the other hand, the informational model, which provides free communication of the knowledge and creative work for the benefit of the general interest, tends to suppress any obstacles to the free communication. The reasons justifying the attachment of the droit (...)